Some med spas offer laser or radiofrequency treatments to the vagina, sold as "rejuvenation," tightening or relief from menopause symptoms. The FDA warned in July 2018 that such energy-based devices may be associated with serious adverse events, and that their safety and effectiveness for these conditions had not been established.1
Here is what that warning says, what a 2021 review and a 2026 meta-analysis found, and what to ask. Whether to have this treatment is for you and a clinician.
The FDA's warning
On 30 July 2018 the FDA warned patients and providers that using energy-based devices to perform vaginal "rejuvenation," cosmetic vaginal procedures or non-surgical vaginal procedures to treat symptoms related to menopause, urinary incontinence or sexual function may be associated with serious adverse events. It said the safety and effectiveness of energy-based devices for these conditions had not been established.1 That is the warning as the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) reports it. Ask your provider whether anything has changed for the device they plan to use.
Myth
Vaginal rejuvenation lasers are FDA-approved for tightening or menopause symptoms.
Fact
In 2018 the FDA warned that the safety and effectiveness of energy-based devices for vaginal rejuvenation, and for menopause symptoms, urinary incontinence and sexual function, had not been established.
What the studies found
A 2021 systematic review identified 59 studies of 3,609 women treated with radiofrequency or fractional ablative laser. The studies reported improvement in symptoms of genitourinary syndrome of menopause or vulvovaginal atrophy, and in sexual function, along with high patient satisfaction and minor adverse events, including pain, swelling or vaginal discharge. The authors say it is still unclear which conditions can be treated, whether maintenance treatment is needed and what the long-term safety concerns are.2
A 2026 meta-analysis took a tighter approach. It pooled 9 trials with a sham or placebo comparison, with 610 participants, all in postmenopausal women with sexual dysfunction or painful intercourse. Six trials studied a CO2 laser, three radiofrequency, one an erbium laser and one a hybrid laser. The data suggest the treatments may be beneficial, but results varied a lot between trials, and the authors say that means considerable uncertainty and caution in interpreting the data.3
What med spas offer
Three in ten med spas we list offer hormone or intimate health services: 2,182 of 7,475. That doesn't say which treatments, so ask what is on offer and what it is based on.4 Which licensed professionals may perform a procedure like this depends on your state. See our guide to who may inject.
Here is what to bring to a consultation.
Questions to bring
The evidence
The person and the plan
Cost
We don't give prices on this page.
Find clinics
Each listing shows what the clinic’s own website offers, its Google reviews and its hours. No clinic is graded yet.
Common questions
What did the FDA say about vaginal rejuvenation?
In July 2018 it warned that energy-based devices used for vaginal rejuvenation, or to treat menopause symptoms, urinary incontinence or sexual function, may be associated with serious adverse events, and that safety and effectiveness had not been established.
Does vaginal rejuvenation work?
A 2021 review of 59 studies reported improvement and high satisfaction. A 2026 meta-analysis of 9 sham-controlled trials suggests possible benefit but with considerable uncertainty.
What are the side effects?
The 2021 review reported minor events such as pain, swelling or vaginal discharge. The FDA's 2018 warning said serious adverse events may be associated with these devices.
Is it a long-term fix?
The 2021 review's authors say it is unclear whether maintenance treatment is needed and what the long-term safety concerns are.
Sources (4)
- IUGA, FDA Warns Against Use of Energy-Based Devices to Perform Vaginal 'Rejuvenation' or Vaginal Cosmetic Procedures: FDA Safety Communication (notice of 30 July 2018) · International Urogynecological Association (IUGA), a professional society, reporting the FDA's safety communication of 30 July 2018. The FDA's own page could not be opened from the addresses I tried. · read 30 Oct 2026
- Vaginal Rejuvenation: A Retrospective Review of Lasers and Radiofrequency Devices (Dermatol Surg 2021, PubMed 33165070) · Peer-reviewed systematic review of 59 studies (3,609 women). Abstract read on 30 Oct 2026; full text not read. · read 30 Oct 2026
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Energy-based Devices For Postmenopausal Sexual Dysfunction (J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2026, PubMed 40505887) · Peer-reviewed systematic review and meta-analysis of 9 sham- or placebo-controlled randomized trials (610 participants). Abstract read on 30 Oct 2026; full text not read. · read 30 Oct 2026
- Clinic websites: what they say on their own pages · Our own read of listed clinics' websites in the 14 states we cover, October 2026. A clinic counts once. · read 30 Oct 2026
